The Structural Realignment: Deconstructing the Shift from Legacy Primes to Agile Capital

In Fiscal Year 2016, the Department of Defense (DoD) obligated a modest $1.8 billion through Other Transaction Authorities (OTAs), a flexible contracting mechanism designed to engage non-traditional partners. By Fiscal Year 2024, that figure had exploded to over $18 billion—a tenfold increase that signals an unprecedented structural shift in a marketplace historically dominated by an oligopoly of incumbents.

For seven decades, the U.S. defense apparatus - which formally replaced the Department of War in 1947—relied almost exclusively on a centralized cadre of legacy giants: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon. These relationships offered stability but fostered a culture of lethargy, resulting in innovation cycles that lagged dangerously behind the commercial sector’s velocity.

Today, the landscape is unrecognizable. From SpaceX’s dominance in launch to Anduril’s vertically integrated counter-drone systems, the market is being remade by agile capital and asymmetric technology.

This transformation was not a gentle evolution. It was a forced realignment driven by external shocks, brazen litigation, and a cadre of internal reformers who dismantled the "walled garden". For the strategic investor and the technology executive, understanding the mechanics of this shift is a prerequisite for navigating the future defense industrial base.

The Era of Consolidation and the Valley of Death (1960s–2014)

Following World War II and the onset of the Cold War, the defense industrial base ossified around a model of long-term, specialized R&D. A handful of "Prime Contractors" - the "Big 5" - emerged as the undisputed gatekeepers of national security capital. Through the 1990s, this system consolidated further (e.g., the mergers of Lockheed & Martin Marietta, Boeing & McDonnell Douglas), creating high barriers to entry that favored cost-plus contracts for massive hardware programs .

While efficient for building aircraft carriers, this risk-averse system proved catastrophic for software and rapid innovation. In the face of asymmetric threats like counterinsurgency and cyber warfare, the model failed. Brilliant commercial technologies - especially software - routinely died in the "Valley of Death," the structural gap between a funded prototype and a Program of Record. The Pentagon had forgotten how to buy "new."

The Legal Breaches: Litigation as Strategy (2014–2016)

The disruption of this monopoly did not originate from a policy memo. It was forced by two technology pioneers who wielded federal law as a battering ram against the acquisition bureaucracy.

2014: SpaceX vs. The United States Air Force Elon Musk’s SpaceX sued the Air Force to break the multi-billion-dollar monopoly on national security launches held by United Launch Alliance (a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin). SpaceX argued a fundamental economic truth: they could execute the mission at a fraction of the incumbent's cost. They prevailed, legally forcing the Pentagon to open the launch market to competition.

2016: Palantir vs. The United States Army Palantir Technologies sued the U.S. Army, arguing the service was violating the 1994 Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA). The statute mandated that the government consider commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions before building custom alternatives. The Army had ignored Palantir’s proven data platform in favor of a failing, custom-built internal program. A federal judge agreed with Palantir. This was a legal bombshell: the DoD was now judicially compelled to evaluate commercial technology before funding custom development.

The Institutional Response: Building the Bridges (2015–2019)

As the legal walls cracked, internal reformers began constructing the necessary infrastructure to intake commercial innovation.

• 2015: The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) was established in Silicon Valley. Its mandate was to bypass the traditional FAR Part 15 procurement system and utilize OTAs to rapidly prototype and field commercial technology.

• 2017: The Air Force launched AFWERX, a decentralized innovation arm designed to connect small business innovation directly to program offices.

These organizations served as the official bridge-builders across the Valley of Death. They created the "fast lane" that companies like Anduril Industries exploited. Founded in 2017, Anduril utilized venture capital to fund its own R&D—a radical departure from the cost-plus model—and leveraged DIU’s fast-track authorities to secure large-scale deployments, validating the "build to mission" approach.

The Capital Alignment: The Office of Strategic Capital (2020–2024)

The victories of SpaceX, Palantir, and Anduril sent a definitive signal to the capital markets: the fortress was breached.

Between 2020 and 2023, venture capital - which had historically viewed defense as uninvestable due to long sales cycles and capped returns - poured into the sector. Funding volumes dwarfed the entire previous decade.

The DoD responded by institutionalizing this relationship. In 2022, the Office of Strategic Capital (OSC) was founded, acknowledging a new reality: the DoD needed to act as an investor to help critical technologies scale. By 2024, the OSC launched its new loan authority, creating a government-backed financing mechanism to ensure that the next generation of hardware startups does not fail due to a lack of production-level capital.

The Current State: Empirical Evidence of Shift

The transformation is no longer hypothetical. The data indicates a structural realignment in how the DoD allocates capital:

1. Asymmetric Funding Velocities: While the total number of defense contractors has contracted, the number of new entrants - companies winning their first prime contract - spiked by 114% between FY22 and FY23. This validates that DIU and AFWERX are successfully onboarding non-traditional vendors.

2. The OTA Explosion: The shift from $1.8 billion to $18 billion in OTA obligations represents a fundamental change in risk appetite. The DoD is increasingly willing to trade the compliance security of the FAR for the speed of the commercial market, cutting award timelines in half.

   
   

3. Market Confidence: "In 2023-2024, we may see the most robust environment for defense tech startups in decades," notes Nick Beim of Venrock. The capital markets have priced in the reality that startups can win nine-and-ten-figure Programs of Record.

The Strategic Horizon

The shift from a closed oligopoly to an open ecosystem of agile innovators is a fundamental transformation of the defense industrial base. Lawsuits kicked open the door; DIU built the bridges; and now, the OSC and private capital are paving a multi-lane highway.

What Comes Next?

• Dual-Use Normalization: The most successful entrants will design for both commercial and defense markets simultaneously from Day One, using commercial revenue to de-risk defense sales cycles.

• Deep Tech Capital Convergence: Expect the OSC to heavily co-invest with private capital in critical areas like quantum science, advanced materials, and microelectronics, where the technical risk is too high for pure VC models.

• Ecosystem Symbiosis: The narrative of "Startups vs. Primes" will evolve into a model of co-development. Agile entrants will provide the software and AI architectures, while incumbents will integrate those systems at scale.

The Strategic Imperative For the investor, the legal and bureaucratic risks have been significantly reduced. For the executive, the path from prototype to production exists in a way it did not a decade ago. The "Valley of Death" is not gone, but it is bridgeable for those who align with the new authorities. The era of "the way we’ve always done it" is over. Those who adapt to these new market realities will build the next generation of defense solutions.

This is the difference between activity and progress. At DualSight, we provide the Strategic Advisory to align your venture with these new pathways and the Acquisition Vector Strategy to navigate the OTA and OSC landscape. We ensure you are positioned on the right side of this structural shift.

SCHEDULE A CALL