The "Go Now" Authority: Leveraging Letter Contracts (UCAs) for Asymmetric Speed

A typhoon veers off course, crippling a key naval base in the Pacific. A new, unidentified adversary drone appears on the battlefield, rendering existing countermeasures obsolete. A critical satellite constellation fails, threatening a gap in strategic communications.

The response cannot wait 18 months for a standard Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15 cycle. It must happen now.

This is the domain of the Letter Contract, formally known as a Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA).

For executives and founders, this vehicle is the "break glass in case of emergency" tool of defense acquisition. It is a high-risk, high-speed, high-trust mechanism that authorizes a company to start work immediately and incur costs before a final, complete contract is negotiated.

It is not a financial blank check. It is a calculated risk the government takes when the cost of delay exceeds the cost of inefficiency. Understanding how this tool works - and the immense financial risks it carries - is critical for any company serious about becoming a mission-critical partner.

The Legal Architecture: What is a Letter Contract?

A Letter Contract is a binding contract governed by FAR 16.603. It allows a contractor to start performance on the government's "good faith" while the full terms, conditions, and (most importantly) the final price are still being negotiated.

It is called a "letter" because it often begins as just that - a formal letter from a Contracting Officer (KO) authorizing you to proceed. However, it is structurally defined by two critical, non-negotiable components:

1. The Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Amount: This is the government's maximum financial liability before the final contract is signed. It acts as a funding ceiling, typically set at 50% or less of the total estimated cost . You cannot bill beyond this amount until the contract is finalized.

2. The Definitization Schedule: This is the deadline for finalizing the full contract. By law, this date must be within 180 days of the letter's issuance or before 50% of the NTE has been spent, whichever comes first . This deadline is the "ticking clock" that defines the entire engagement.

   
   

The Strategic Use Case: When is the Weapon Used?

Letter Contracts are reserved for extreme urgency. The legal standard is "unusual and compelling urgency" that precludes the time needed to negotiate a full contract. You will see them in three primary scenarios:

1. Disaster Relief & Emergency Response

• The Scenario: A hurricane devastates a military base. The commander needs power restored and runways cleared immediately.

• The Execution: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issues a Letter Contract to a pre-vetted engineering firm to "mobilize all assets tonight" while the lawyers hammer out the full fixed-price terms over the next 30 days .

  
  

2. Urgent Wartime Needs (UONs/JUONs)

• The Scenario: A new IED variant appears in-theater. A Combatant Command (COCOM) issues an Urgent Operational Need (UON).

• The Execution: The relevant Program Executive Officer (PEO) identifies a company with a promising counter-measure and issues a Letter Contract to "begin low-rate production today," bypassing the standard solicitation process to get units to the field in 90 days .

  
  

3. Sudden R&D Breakthroughs

• The Scenario: An adversary demonstrates a hypersonic capability. DARPA needs to immediately fund a U.S. technology to develop a counter.

• The Execution: They issue a Letter Contract to a specialized R&D firm to "commence testing and integration" immediately, skipping the 6-month Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) cycle .

  
  

The "Two-Front War": The Definitization Gauntlet

This is the pitfall that destroys naive contractors. The Letter Contract starts the work, but it does not guarantee the final price/profit. While you are busy executing the mission (clearing debris, building jammers), you are simultaneously required to prepare and submit a "qualifying proposal" for the full contract .

This creates a high-stakes "Two-Front War":

• Front 1 (Execution): You must perform the mission flawlessly under intense pressure.

• Front 2 (Justification): You must meticulously document every single hour of labor, every dollar of material, and every item of overhead in a DCAA-compliant manner.

  
  

The Risk: When you sit down to negotiate the final contract, you have already spent the money. The government knows this. Your only leverage—your only legal armor—is your auditable, iron-clad documentation. If you cannot prove your costs to the DCAA auditor, the government can and will refuse to pay them . This is where companies get crushed: they perform heroically in the field but fail the audit, forcing them to eat millions in unallowable costs.

The Strategic Playbook: Preparing for the "3 AM Call"

You do not "win" a Letter Contract out of the blue. You are selected for one based on pre-existing trust. This is a high-trust vehicle. Your strategy is to become the partner who gets the call.

Phase 1: Pre-Crisis (The "Peacetime" Shield)

• Build Trust: You must be a known, vetted entity. Deliver on unclassified, fixed-price contracts first.

• Arm Your Champion: Your PEO or COCOM champion must know exactly what your capability is.

• The DCAA Shield: Have a DCAA-ready accounting system before you need it. This proves you are a mature, low-risk partner capable of handling a cost-reimbursable environment.

  
  

Phase 2: The Call (The Negotiation)

• The ROM: Be ready to provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) price and a high-level Statement of Work (SOW) within hours.

• The Negotiation: Fight for a realistic NTE ceiling. Do not let them box you in at 20% of the cost if you will burn that in three weeks. Ensure the Definitization Schedule gives you enough time (e.g., 90-180 days) to build a quality proposal .

  
  

Phase 3: The Execution (The Shadow Team)

• Run a Shadow Team: Your execution team is in the field, but your finance/contracts team must be in a "sprint." They must process timecards daily and log all material costs against the correct charge codes .

• Segregation: Do not mix commercial and government costs.

• Transparency: Send weekly cost reports to the Contracting Officer. This prevents "sticker shock" later.

  
  

Phase 4: The Definitization (The Audit)

• Submit On Time: Submitting your qualifying proposal late is a breach of contract and gives the government massive leverage.

• The Audit File: Your proposal isn't a "pitch"; it is an audit file. Every number must be backed by a timecard, invoice, or compliant indirect rate calculation .

  
  

From Stop-Gap to Strategic Partner

The Letter Contract is the pinnacle of government trust. It is a high-stakes, high-risk mechanism reserved for critical missions where speed is the only metric that matters.

For a founder, being "Letter Contract-ready" means you have transcended being a "vendor." You have proven your execution discipline, your financial maturity, and your absolute reliability. You have become the trusted partner the DoD calls when the mission cannot fail.

A Letter Contract is an opportunity wrapped in a financial minefield. At DualSight, we provide the Strategic Advisory to help you build that trust and the Capacity Building to forge the financial and compliance "shield" you need to survive the audit that follows.

SCHEDULE A CALL