Decoding the Demand Signals: An Insider’s Look at the COCOM Integrated Priorities Lists

In the complex ecosystem of defense technology, finding the true demand signal often feels like searching for a specific radio frequency in a storm of static. Founders and capture managers are bombarded with buzzwords - AI, autonomy, cyber, quantum - but struggle to discern which problems actually keep Combatant Commanders (COCOMs) awake at night.

Where should a firm focus its limited Bid & Proposal (B&P) resources?

The answer does not lie in generic industry reports or the endless cycle of "Demo Days". The most potent, validated, and influential demand signals are often hidden in plain sight, yet missed by the majority of the defense industrial base: the Integrated Priority List (IPL).

These are not merely bureaucratic wish lists. The IPL is the COCOM Commander’s direct, prioritized "911 call" to the Pentagon and Congress. It outlines the critical, unfunded capability gaps that create unacceptable risk to the mission.

Understanding the IPL is not just "market intelligence" - it is the key to strategic alignment. It is the difference between pitching a "cool capability" and solving a validated, Commander-level problem.

The Strategic Mechanism: What is an IPL?

To understand the IPL, you must understand the pressure on the Combatant Commander. Imagine the Commander of USINDOPACOM responsible for the vast Pacific theater. They face daily pressure from near-peer adversaries and see specific gaps in logistics, long-range fires, and undersea awareness that their currently funded programs do not address .

The IPL is the formal mechanism for that Commander to rank those gaps and send a prioritized list up the chain of command.

• The Purpose: To identify and rank the COCOM's most critical unfunded or underfunded requirements needed to execute their assigned missions.

• The Audience: The IPL is written for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), the Secretary of Defense (SecDef), the Military Services (who must resource the needs), and Congress.

• The Impact: IPLs heavily influence the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) process. They shape Congressional "adds" (funding above the President's request) and drive Service R&D priorities.

  
  

Essentially, an IPL is the COCOM saying, "If you give me more resources, these are the exact problems I need to solve, in this order". An item high on a COCOM IPL carries immense institutional weight.

Why IPLs Trump "Wish Lists"

Every day, companies pitch "innovative solutions" to various DoD offices. End-users get excited. Mid-level officers express interest. Yet, these engagements often translate to nothing. Why? Because the need was never validated.

The IPL solves the validation problem.

1. Validation: An IPL item represents a need that has been vetted through the COCOM's rigorous internal processes and signed off by the Commander. It is not just one person's "good idea".

2. Prioritization: Resources are finite. An IPL explicitly ranks needs, forcing trade-offs and signaling what is truly critical versus merely "nice to have".

3. Influence: When a COCOM Commander testifies before Congress, their priorities—often reflecting the IPL—carry far more influence than a Program Manager's pitch.

4. Urgency: IPLs highlight gaps that pose significant operational risk, giving them inherent urgency within the planning process.

   
   

Aligning your solution with a known COCOM priority from an IPL instantly elevates your credibility. You are no longer selling tech; you are offering a direct solution to a validated, Commander-level problem .

The Intelligence Challenge: Finding the Signal

There is a catch: IPLs themselves are often classified or not publicly released in their entirety. You typically will not find a COCOM's ranked IPL posted on SAM.gov. Direct access usually requires deep relationships or specific program involvement.

However, the priorities articulated in the IPLs bleed out into the public domain through several key channels. These are your Proxy Signals .

1. Commander Testimony & Posture Statements Each year, COCOM Commanders testify before the House and Senate Armed Services Committees (HASC/SASC). Their prepared statements and Q&A sessions are open-source goldmines. They explicitly state their top concerns, challenges, and capability needs—which directly reflect their IPL priorities.

2. Service Unfunded Requirements Lists (UFRs) When the military Services (Army, Navy, Air Force) submit their budgets, they also provide Congress with a list of priorities that didn't make the cut—their Unfunded Requirements (UFRs). These lists are frequently influenced by the needs highlighted in COCOM IPLs, as Services try to show Congress they are responsive to warfighter demands.

3. Budget Justification Documents (R-Docs/P-Docs) When a new program start or a significant funding increase appears in the DoD budget request, the justification often explicitly references the need to address a specific COCOM capability gap. This signals alignment with a prioritized need.

4. Targeted Solicitations (BAAs, RFIs) When innovation hubs like DIU, AFWERX, or SOFWERX issue a solicitation focused on a specific operational problem (e.g., "long-range ISR for maritime chokepoints"), it often traces back to a COCOM-identified gap, potentially from an IPL.

5. Strategic Documents & Speeches Publicly released COCOM strategy documents and Commander's speeches at defense conferences often outline broad strategic priorities that shape the IPLs.

The Alignment Playbook: Turning Insight into Action

Finding the signal is not enough. You need to turn that intelligence into a concrete capture strategy.

1. Systematic Intelligence Gathering Do not rely on random articles. Systematically track COCOM testimony, UFRs, budget shifts, and public statements . Look for recurring themes and specific capability mentions across different COCOMs or year-over-year.

2. Map Capability to Priority Once you identify a recurring COCOM priority that aligns with your solution (e.g., EUCOM needs resilient comms in an EW environment), explicitly make that connection in all your materials.

3. Weaponize the Narrative Your pitch isn't just "Our radio is jam-resistant." It is: "Our software-defined radio directly addresses EUCOM's stated priority for assured communications in a contested electromagnetic spectrum, a gap highlighted in General Cavoli's recent HASC testimony" . This framing moves the conversation from technical specs to operational relevance.

4. Arm Your Internal Champion Give your champion within a Service PEO the ammunition they need. Help them justify prioritizing your solution by showing it directly supports a validated COCOM requirement . This gives them "top cover" to push for funding or utilize faster acquisition pathways.

5. Focus Your Engagement Use your IPL insights to target your outreach. Engage with the specific COCOM staff—specifically the J8 (Requirements) or Service Component Commands (e.g., PACAF for INDOPACOM air requirements)—whose mission aligns with the identified priority .

The Strategic Advantage: Listening Louder Than You Pitch

The Combatant Commands are the ultimate customers, defining the operational needs that drive the entire defense acquisition system. Their Integrated Priority Lists, while often shielded from direct view, represent the most powerful, validated demand signals available.

Companies that master the art of detecting and aligning with these signals move beyond simply selling technology. They become strategic partners, directly contributing to solving the nation's most critical security challenges. They demonstrate the mission focus and execution discipline that builds trust and wins long-term programs.

Decoding these signals is not an administrative task; it is a strategic necessity. At DualSight, decoding these signals and building alignment strategies is core to our mission. We provide the Mission Architecture Mapping to cut through the noise, identify the real priorities, and position your capability to meet the validated needs of the warfighter.

SCHEDULE A CALL