The Commercial Item Contract: Leveraging FAR Part 12 to Bypass the Acquisition Gauntlet
- Jordan Clayton

- Jul 13
- 5 min read

For a commercial technology founder, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) represents a formidable, almost existential barrier to entry. To the uninitiated, it appears as a 2,000-page labyrinth designed to suffocate innovation with government-unique compliance, specialized cost-accounting standards, and multi-year budget cycles. The perception is that unless you are a defense prime with a compliance department larger than your engineering team, you cannot compete.
This perception is partially correct. The traditional path - FAR Part 15 "Contracting by Negotiation" - is indeed a slow, bureaucratic death march. It requires certified cost data, invasive audits, and often demands that you surrender critical intellectual property rights.
However, there exists a statutory "fast lane" designed specifically to circumvent these hurdles: FAR Part 12, the regulation governing Commercial Item Contracts.
Enacted under the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) of 1994, this regulation mandates that the government prefer commercial products and services over custom development. This is not merely a contracting preference; it is a fundamental shift in acquisition philosophy. It forces the government to buy like a business, stripping away the most toxic compliance requirements and enabling firms to sell on standard commercial terms.
For SaaS founders, dual-use hardware innovators, and non-traditional defense contractors, the Commercial Item Contract is the primary mechanism to accelerate adoption while protecting margins and IP. It transforms the government from a regulator into a customer. But accessing this lane requires more than just having a product; it requires the execution discipline to prove your commerciality.
Defining the Instrument: What Qualifies as a Commercial Item?
To unlock the speed and protection of FAR Part 12, a firm must first secure a Commercial Item Determination (CID). The Contracting Officer (KO) must sign off that your product meets the statutory definition.
The government will not just take your word for it; you must fit the definitions in FAR 2.101. Fortunately, these definitions are intentionally broad to capture modern innovation. Understanding these nuances is critical for your capture strategy.
1. COTS (Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf) These are products sold in substantial quantities to the general public in the commercial marketplace. Examples include laptops, standard software licenses (Microsoft Office), or construction equipment. If you sell the exact same widget to the DoD that you sell to Fortune 500 companies, without modification, you are COTS. This is the easiest determination to secure.
2. "Of a Type" This is the critical strategic lever for startups. A product does not need a long sales history to qualify. It simply needs to be "of a type" customarily used by the commercial market.
The Strategic Logic: A brand new logistics SaaS platform qualifies not because it has been sold for ten years, but because "logistics software" is a recognized commercial category. This allows emerging technology to draft behind established commercial precedents. You do not need to prove your product is ubiquitous; you only need to prove the category is.
3. Minor Modifications Many founders hesitate to pursue Commercial Item Contracts because they believe any customization for the government disqualifies them. This is a fallacy.
The Rule: Customizing a commercial product for government use—for example, hardening a sensor for extreme temperatures, adding a specific encryption layer to a software tool, or ruggedizing a casing—does not break its commercial status, provided the modification is "minor".
The Definition of Minor: The modification must not significantly alter the nongovernmental function or essential physical characteristics of an item or component, or change the purpose of a process.
4. Support Services Installation, training, and maintenance services that support a commercial product are also considered commercial. This allows you to bundle implementation labor with your license sales under the same streamlined terms, avoiding the need to split contracts between "Products" (Part 12) and "Services" (Part 15).
The Strategic Advantage: The FAR Part 12 Shield
Securing a commercial determination is not just about checking a box; it activates a "shield" that protects your business model from the most invasive aspects of federal contracting. It allows you to maintain your commercial character while serving a sovereign client.
1. Exemption from Cost Audits (The DCAA Shield) In a traditional "cost-plus" environment, firms must maintain a Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) compliant accounting system to prove their internal costs. This requires tracking every minute of labor and every dollar of overhead to the penny. It is an administrative burden that kills startup velocity.
The Commercial Advantage: Under FAR Part 12, because the price is established by market forces (competition), the government is prohibited from auditing internal cost structures. This removes the requirement for Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), saving firms hundreds of thousands of dollars in overhead and preventing the government from peering into your margins.
2. Exemption from TINA The Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) requires firms to disclose "certified cost or pricing data" for large contracts—essentially opening your books to show exactly how much profit you are making.
The Commercial Advantage: FAR Part 12 exempts commercial items from this requirement. Pricing is justified by market data, commercial price lists, and sales history, not a bottom-up cost build. Your profit margins remain your private business.
3. IP Protection Under standard FAR clauses (like FAR 52.227-14), the government often claims broad "Government Purpose Rights" or even "Unlimited Rights" to technical data developed with federal funds.
The Commercial Advantage: Under FAR Part 12, commercial software is licensed, not sold. The government accepts the firm’s standard End User License Agreement (EULA), ensuring the firm retains ownership of its source code and trade secrets. This is the only way to ensure your company remains investable by venture capital.
The Execution Playbook: Asserting Commerciality
Commerciality is not assumed; it must be proven. You must proactively provide the Contracting Officer with the evidence they need to write the determination. If you wait for them to do the research, they will likely default to a more restrictive contract type.
1. The Evidence Package (The Commerciality Report) Firms must build a "Commerciality Report" or dossier. This is not marketing material; it is legal evidence.
Marketing Materials: Brochures and website screenshots showing the product is offered to the public.
Commercial Price Lists: Published pricing models that establish a market rate.
Sales History: Redacted invoices from non-government sales (even to foreign or local governments) to prove the product is "customarily used".
Private Investment: Documentation of private venture capital funding is powerful evidence that the technology was developed at private expense, not government expense.
2. The Proposal Strategy Never wait to be asked. Every proposal should explicitly assert commerciality in the Executive Summary and the Contracts Volume: "The offered solution is a Commercial Item as defined in FAR 2.101. This proposal is submitted in accordance with FAR Part 12. As such, we have provided our standard commercial license (EULA), and we are exempt from TINA and DCAA/CAS requirements". This frames the negotiation from Day One. It forces the government to rebut your assertion rather than asking you to prove it later.
3. The Pricing Strategy While you are exempt from cost audits, you must still prove your price is "fair and reasonable."
The Strategy: Ensure your government price aligns with or is better than the price charged to your "Most Favored Customer" in the private sector. The government expects a discount for volume and reliability. Use your existing sales history to demonstrate value. If you have no sales history, use "market research" of competitor pricing to justify your rates.
From Vendor to Commercial Partner
The Commercial Item Contract is the government's admission that the commercial market moves faster than the defense industrial base. For founders, it is a strategic shield that protects IP, margins, and agility.
By leveraging this vehicle, you stop being a "traditional" contractor bound by 1960s-era accounting rules and become a true commercial partner, selling to the government on the same terms that have made you successful in the private sector. It allows businesses to scale by accessing government buyers without reinventing their offerings.
FAR Part 12 is the "fast lane," but accessing it requires systematic execution. You must build a defensible commerciality case and have the strategic resolve to refuse non-commercial terms for commercial products. At DualSight, we provide the Strategic Advisory to structure your commercial assertion and the Capture Strategy to align with the buyers who utilize these streamlined authorities.


